Promotion of anagen, increased hair density and reduction of hair fall in a clinical setting following identification of FGF5-inhibiting compounds via a novel 2-stage process

In vitro study

Clinical study

All clinical efficacy experiments and safety testing were performed by an independent, FDA-registered, GCP/GLP-compliant and ISO 9001-certified laboratory (AMA Laboratories Inc., New City, NY, USA) following standard operating procedures. All testing and data recording were performed on site. AMA Laboratories Inc. performed the enrollment and allocation to treatment groups. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of AMA Laboratories Inc. according to the US Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 56.

Test material and safety testing

We proceeded to test the best performing single-molecule isolate, which in this manuscript is designated as MTP3. There were 3 treatment arms. Placebo treatment of évolis tonic base with no active ingredients and 2 treatment formulations: treatment group 1 (évolis tonic formulation with 0.095% MTP3) and treatment group 2 (évolis tonic formulation with 0.5% MTP3). The tonic base consisted of the following ingredients (%w/v) in purified water: ethanol (60%) (Mandrila Group, Sydney, Australia), 1,3-butylene glycol (3%) (OXEA Corporation, Oberhausen, Germany), panthenyl ethyl ether (0.3%) (Rita Corporation, Crystal Lake, IL, USA), glycyrrhentinic acid (0.1%) (Maruzen Pharmaceuticals), citric acid, (0.025%) (LabChem Inc, Zelienople, PA, USA), and sodium citrate (0.024%) (LabChem Inc). Preservative efficacy and safety testing were performed, and results are described in the Supplementary materials.

Clinical study participant recruitment and selection

Male and female participants were recruited at the study site via advertisements and were inducted after written informed consent in accordance with US Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 50. Hair loss criteria for participants were patterned baldness at Hamilton–Norwood scale 2–4 for men or Ludwig scale I-2 to II-2 for women (Figure 2), but not confounded by other specific hair disorders such as alopecia areata, cyclic alopecia, loose anagen syndrome, acute anagen or telogen effluvium and trichotillomania, confirmed by examination by a trained clinical evaluator.

Participants were included if they were in general good health, non-obese (body mass index [BMI] 19–26 kg/m² by standard calculation) and free of any health problems, including neurological, dermatological or systemic disorder. All participants agreed to use the same shampoo and maintain the same hair style, length and color during the entire study and refrain from cutting the scalp hair shorter than 1 inch (~2.5 cm) in length.

Participants were excluded if they displayed any of the confounding hair loss conditions described earlier. They were also excluded if they had been diagnosed with chronic skin allergies, generalized allergies, scalp inflammation or skin conditions or were being treated for any specific condition and/or taking any medication that may interfere with the study design. Additionally, individuals who were involved in any other clinical research studies, those who had previously experienced irritation or sensitivity to topical products, those receiving any hair loss treatments at the time of or in the last 6 weeks prior to enrollment and those suffering from hypothyroidism or receiving a thyroid hormone treatment in the last 6 weeks prior to enrollment were excluded. Females who were pregnant, lactating, had been pregnant, given birth within the 6-month period immediately preceding study commencement or planning pregnancy within 6 months were also excluded. Finally, participants with a history of any form of skin cancer, melanoma, lupus, psoriasis, connective tissue disease, diabetes or any disease that would increase the risk associated with study participation were additionally excluded from the study group.

Study design and treatment protocol

The study was conducted according to a single-blind placebo-controlled protocol, in which study participants were blind to treatment, with randomized complete block design of 3 age- and gender-matched groups with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio (placebo, 0.095% MTP3, 0.5% MTP3). The product for each treatment arm was supplied in bottles that were coded and de-identified as to their contents. All participants were trained in the correct application of the product to the target areas of the scalp and were directed to use the formulation twice a day, morning and evening, on dry or damp hair for the 16-week study period. Participants were instructed that if routine washing or conditioning was performed that the formulation was to be applied after such activities, but before any styling. Compliance was assessed via phone contact at weeks 1 and 4 and at clinic/facility visits at week 8 and 16.

AT ratio analysis

Hair shafts were excised from the treated region of the scalp using a standardized technique³³ at days 0 (baseline), 56 and 112, with a minimum of 10 hair shafts required for analysis. Shafts were categorized as anagen (growth phase) or telogen (falling phase),³⁴ and ratios of anagen to telogen counts (AT) were calculated according to Van Scott.³⁵

Hair fall analysis

Hair fall was measured using gravimetric determination via the Maibach³⁶ hair pull technique at days 0 (baseline), 56 and 112. A trained technician combed each participant’s hair 20 times using a standardized technique, capturing and weighing the ���fall-off”.

Visual evaluation

A trained expert clinical evaluator assessed global hair release and recovery condition for hair volume at baseline and days 56 and 112 using a modified visual analog scale with an 11-point grading scale from 0 representing poor to 10 indicating excellent.

High-resolution scientifically matched photography

A small subset of 3 females and 3 males from treatment group 1 was chosen, at baseline, to participate in the photogrammetric investigation at days 0 (baseline), 56 and 112. High-resolution, digitally certified un-retouched photographs were taken of the top center of the scalp, with the front of the camera lens standardized for each participant, perpendicular to the basic plane, centered within the line of intersection of coronal and mid-sagittal planes of the head. Photographic procedures and settings were standardized with fixed camera background, angles, settings, lighting, participant positioning, color bars and white balance. Photographs were evaluated using PhotoGrammetrix^® Image analysis (AMA Laboratories Inc.), quantifying hair density, release and recovery.

Statistical analysis

All data were examined via descriptive statistics to ensure assumptions of standard statistical analysis were met. If necessary and where appropriate, data were log2 transformed. Parametric and non-parametric tests were applied as appropriate to the data. Differences within treatment groups over successive time points were assessed through one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Friedman test with post hoc pairwise comparisons via Tukey’s pairwise comparisons or paired Wilcoxon rank sign tests, respectively. Comparisons between test groups were performed via one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis with post hoc testing via Tukey’s pairwise comparisons and Mann–Whitney tests, respectively. Paired t-tests were also performed as appropriate.

FGF5 inhibitory assays

We tested the FGF5 inhibitory efficacy of monoterpenoids, in parallel to EPT extract, Camelia seed extract and SO extract using 2 cell-based assays of FGF5 activity. We first assessed the ability of test compounds to inhibit FGF5-induced proliferation of the engineered FGF receptor 1-expressing BaF3 cell line.²⁷ The BaF3 cell line used in the study is a cell line engineered to express FGFR1c, originally used to study the splice variant of FGF5 known as FGF5s.²⁶ The BaF3 cell lineage is IL-3 dependent and responds to the presence of IL-3 by proliferating. The cell line is commonly used in signaling research as it is readily transformed.³⁷ The transfection of the BaF3 cell line with FGFR1c also makes it responsive to FGF5, proliferating in its presence. The use of IL-3 in this assay is thus a control that only indicates test compound non-specific inhibition of cell culture growth. When this is compared to specific inhibition of cell growth via blocking interaction of FGF5 with its receptor expressed on the engineered BaF3 cells, we can identify true FGF5-inhibiting compounds. The inhibitory efficacy was determined by the ratio of the IC₅₀ of the test compound in the presence of FGF5 against the IC₅₀ of the test compound in the presence of IL-3. The former indicating FGF5-dependent inhibition, and the latter being representative of non-specific inhibition of cell growth. Large differences in the specific and non-specific inhibition of cell growth by the test compounds were indicative of high efficacy of FGF5 inhibition, in contrast to non-specific effects on cell viability, which tended to occur at high concentrations. An example of a curve from an individual experiment is shown for illustrative purposes in Figure 3B. Analysis of these data showed that MTP3 had significant inhibitory efficacy: 1.6-fold higher than crude EPT extract (p = 0.065) and close to 7-fold more efficacy than SO extract (p = 0.0024), while having 2.4-fold, 1.9-fold and 4.8-fold higher mean efficacy measures than MTP4 (p = 0.013), MTP5 (p = 0.036) and MTP6 (p = 0.0018), respectively (Figure 3A). Data from samples that only had low activity are not shown.

We also tested the FGF5 inhibitory activity of MTP3 in vitro with our DP cell-based assay, using ALP activity as an indicator of the anagen period. We use this method as an anagen/catagen transition model with exogenous FGF5 interacting with FGFR1 on the DP cells, inducing catagen and correspondingly reducing ALP activity. FGF5-inhibiting compounds, when added to the cell culture alongside exogenous FGF5, should stimulate the recovery of anagen and hence increase ALP activity in a dose-dependent manner. An anagen recovery factor was calculated by comparing the maximum increase of ALP activity over baseline for FGF5-inhibited cells to the ALP activity over baseline for the test compound alone at that specific concentration. An example from 1 experiment is displayed in Figure 4B. We observed that MTP3 had the strongest ability to recover anagen phase (Figure 4A), with an average recovery factor double that of SO extract (0.69 compared with 0.32) and improved performance compared to the other monoterpene isolates. Such results were indicative of effective FGF5 inhibitory activity and highlighted MTP3 as a strong candidate for testing in a clinical setting.

Clinical cohort characteristics

We recruited 32 individuals to our single-blind placebo-controlled study, the majority White Caucasian. Individuals were de-identified and randomized into 3 equal groups matched by age and gender (Table 1). When we compared baseline measurements of hair loss scale scores, visual grading, hair fall and AT between the cohorts in a post hoc manner, we also found a good balance between the tested parameters except for hair fall. In the hair fall category, we observed the 0.095% MTP3 test group as having significantly higher hair fall at baseline vs. the placebo group (p = 0.008) and vs. the 0.5% MTP3 group (p = 0.02). We also noted some outliers in hair fall, particularly in females at baseline. All participants completed the study, and no adverse events were reported.

AT ratio comparisons

AT ratio of trial participants at baseline and after treatment was determined through inspection of hair follicles using a standard method.³¹ In the study cohort, most of the individuals had low baseline anagen ratios, with the majority below 50% anagen (0.5 AT ratio; Figure 5A–C, baseline). There was also non-significant imbalance between the treated groups and the placebo, and the latter group had a higher baseline variance. Nevertheless, when the responses of each of the groups to treatment were compared to the group baseline, significant increases in anagen ratios for both 0.095% MTP3 (p = 0.002; Figure 5B) and 0.5% MTP3 (p = 0.03; Figure 5C) were evident at day 112. No differences were found in the placebo group (Figure 5A). The mean improvement in AT ratio (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) and median improvement for each group at day 112 were as follows: 0.095% MTP3, 0.173 (0.075–0.27), 0.10; 0.5% MTP3, 0.127 (0.040–0.215), 0.10; and placebo, 0.060 (−0.074 to 0.194), 0.

The majority of individuals in the treatment groups showed improvement in anagen ratio at day 112 (Figure 5D), with the effect most apparent in the 0.095% MTP3 group with >40% of participants showing improvement in anagen by at least 20 percentage points. While the effect was less consistent in the 0.5% MTP3 group, >35% of participants had an increase in anagen ratio by at least 20 percentage points. We did not find a significant difference in change from baseline of treated groups compared to placebo (Figure 5D), which was likely influenced by the high baseline variance in the placebo group. As stated earlier, there was a strong trend for improvement in the treated groups, but in the placebo group, there was no clear trend, with some participants decreasing in anagen ratio and some increasing, resulting in a median change of 0. Median changes with respect to baseline for treated groups were positive.

Although gender-based analysis was not a primary outcome of the study, we also separated the data into male and female participants. However, the small sample size in this pilot study, particularly in the female cohort, meant that statistical analyses suffered from issues with power. To improve this, we combined the treatment arms (0.095% and 0.5%) into a single treated group prior to gender-based analyses. The results of all gender-based analyses, including both combined and also separated treatment arms, are presented in Figure S2. For the AT ratio, we saw significant difference from baseline in both male (p = 0.007) and female (p = 0.003), with the effect most apparent at day 112 (p = 0.02 and p = 0.016 for female and male, respectively) (Figure S2A). No differences were seen in the placebo group for either gender (Figure S2B). Effect comparisons with respect to baseline between groups (treated vs. placebo) suffered from low sample numbers and high variance in the female placebo group (Figure S2C), but in the male subgroup, we observed a borderline significant difference compared to placebo (p = 0.08), which was not seen in the whole cohort analysis.

Hair fall analysis

We assessed hair fall by collecting hair using the Maibach³⁶ pull technique. We observed no significant differences in the placebo group compared to baseline at either time point (Figure 6A), but we did see a trend for decreased hair fall at day 56 (p = 0.08). Contrastingly, significant decreases in hair fall were observed compared to baseline for both MTP3 formulations (Figure 6B and C) at both day 56 (0.095% MTP3, p = 0.004; 0.5% MTP3, p = 0.007) and day 112 (0.095% MTP3, p = 0.029; 0.5% MTP3, p = 0.013). The mean and median % improvements from baseline for each group at day 112 were as follows: 0.095% MTP3, 80.21% and 78.4%; 0.5% MTP3, 51.9% and 38.4% and placebo, 17.37% and −204%.

Greater than 90% of participants in the MTP3 treatment arms showed improvement in hair fall over baseline at day 112, in contrast 70% of the placebo group showed increased hair fall at day 112. Analyzing hair fall after treatment with respect to baseline enabled comparison between treatment arms (Figure 6D) that highlighted significant differences between the performance of both treatment arms against the placebo at day 112 (0.095% MTP3, p = 0.002; 0.5% MTP3, p = 0.019).

As with the AT ratio earlier, the small sample size in this pilot study, particularly in the female cohort, meant that statistical analyses of the male and female sub-cohorts suffered from issues with power. Therefore, we combined the treatment arms (0.095% and 0.5%) into a single group prior to analysis. For hair fall (Figure S3A), there was a significant difference from baseline in both male (p = 0.002) and female (p = 0.012), with the effect seen at both time points, but most apparent at day 112 for females (p = 0.02) and day 56 for males (p = 0.001). No differences were evident in the female placebo group, and in the male placebo group, there was a significant increase in hair fall at day 112 (p = 0.02) (Figure S3B). Effect comparisons with respect to baseline between groups (treated vs. placebo) suffered from low sample numbers and low power (Figure S3C), but in the male subgroup, a significant difference was apparent in both treatment arms compared to placebo: 0.095% p = 0.001 and 0.5% p = 0.006. All treated females improved in hair fall compared to baseline and to a larger magnitude on average than placebo.

Hair volume via global release and recovery

As an additional measure of hair quality and appearance, we performed expert evaluation of hair volume via global hair release and recovery grading, scored via an 11-point intensity grading scale from 0 = poor and 10 = excellent. Over the course of the study, we observed no significant difference in the placebo group (Figure 7A), with only 2 of the 10 participants showing a slight increase in visual grading, while 1 participant had a slight decrease. Significant improvements in visual grading were observed for both MTP3 formulations compared to baseline at day 112, with all participants in the 0.095% MTP3 group (Figure 7B) increasing in visual grading (p = 0.002), some by 2 grading points. Similarly, 7 (out of 11) participants in the 0.5% MTP3 group (Figure 7C) showed an improvement over baseline at day 112 (p = 0.020), and all participants in this group remained stable in hair volume, with none showing any decrease in hair volume. The mean improvement in grading on the 10-point scale (95% CI) and median improvement for each group at day 112 were as follows: 0.095% MTP3, 1 (0.76–1.25), 1; 0.5% MTP3, 0.73 (0.37–1), 1; placebo, 0.1 (−0.22 to 0.42), 0.

When the data were analyzed in terms of absolute change from baseline for comparison between treatment arms (Figure 7D), a significant difference between the groups was identified. The 0.095% MTP3 group performed significantly better than placebo (p = 0.0005), and the 0.5% MTP3 group also significantly improved compared to placebo (p = 0.012). No difference was found between treatment arms.

As with the AT ratio and hair fall analysis earlier, the small sample size in this pilot study, particularly in the female cohort, meant that statistical analyses of the male and female sub-cohorts suffered from issues with power; therefore, the treatment arms (0.095% and 0.5%) were combined into a single group prior to gender-based analysis. For visual grading (Figure S4A), we saw significant differences from baseline in both male (p = 0.002) and female (p = 0.038), with the effect most apparent at day 112 for females (p = 0.026) and only evident at day 112 for males (p = 0.005). No differences were seen in the placebo groups (Figure S4B). Effect comparisons with respect to baseline between groups (treated vs. placebo) suffered from low sample numbers and low power (Figure S4C), but in the male subgroup, there was a significant difference compared to placebo (p = 0.03). All but one treated female improved in grading compared to the baseline group in which only 1 of 3 placebo females did, and we saw a trend for improvement in females compared to placebo p = 0.075.

High-resolution scientifically matched photography

We performed quantitative analysis of hair volume using high-resolution scientifically matched photography, carried out in a controlled environment in an independent laboratory (AMA Laboratories Inc.). Photographs were converted to a format that enabled quantitation of hair density using PhotoGrammetrix. Due to the small sample size and limitations of this method, these data are presented as supporting information only (Figure S5). Due to large differences in baseline, we analyzed the increase in hair density as a function of baseline (Figure 8). Despite the limitations of this method, we observed that all participants had an increase in the density of hair at day 56, and 5 of 6 participants continued to show an increase in hair density up to day 112. A significant increase in hair density with respect to baseline at day 112 compared to day 56 (p = 0.03; Figure 8) was apparent, highlighting the continued improvement in hair density for this group of participants applying the topical formulation with 0.095% MTP3.

MTP3 is a potent inhibitor of FGF5

We previously observed FGF5 inhibitory activity in botanical extracts and demonstrated efficacy of a topical formulation containing SO extract in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in humans.²⁷ Following the success of those studies, we developed a novel 2-step in vitro screening approach for testing activity of not only crude plant extracts, as we previously described, but also individual compounds, such as the monoterpenoids analyzed in this study. The in vitro screening process removes the need for animal testing in pre-clinical programs, and additionally, the analysis of single molecules rather than crude isolates is a significant progression in the precision of our approach. We observed potent FGF5 inhibitory activity for a number of the botanically derived monoterpenoid molecules using both in vitro assays. Exposure of the engineered cell line that proliferates in the presence of FGF5 to a number of monoterpenoid compounds revealed significant inhibition of cell growth, with inhibitory efficacy scores for the isolate MTP3 up to 7 times greater than those for the previously published FGF5 inhibitor SO extract.²⁷ Further evidence of FGF5 inhibition was provided by a second assay, where activated DP cells in culture recovered anagen activity (measured via ALP activity), compared to control cells and in a dose-responsive manner, when the monoterpenoids were added to cells alongside FGF5. The recovery response seen for MTP3 was at least double that seen for SO extract and approximately double or triple that of the other monoterpene isolates. Such recovery of anagen in the presence of FGF5, which should initiate the termination of the anagen phase, further highlighted the ability of MTP3 to block FGF5 activity.

Clinical study highlighted improved outcomes in individuals with PHL

As the assays earlier indicated that MTP3 was an excellent inhibitor of FGF5, we developed a number of formulations containing MTP3 (0.095% and 0.5%), for clinical testing as a topical treatment. We recruited 32 individuals for a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 3 treatment arms: placebo of tonic formulation base, tonic with 0.095% MTP3 and tonic with 0.5% MTP3. Participants were treated for 112 days and results compared to baseline at day 56 (8 weeks) and day 112 (16 weeks). We observed significant improvements for all tested parameters, particularly after 112 days. Participants receiving placebo did not show improvement in any parameter.

In adults who are not experiencing hair loss, 80–90% of hair follicles should be in anagen,⁶ while those experiencing hair loss tend to present with low anagen ratios. FGF5 is important in the transition of hair follicles out of anagen in humans,¹⁹ and therefore, blocking its activity should result in the lengthening of anagen for individual follicles,²⁷ resulting in an apparent increase over time in the ratio of hair follicles in the anagen phase to those in telogen phase. As mutations in FGF5 have similar effects in both men and women,¹⁹ and as the shortening of anagen phase is common to both male and female hair loss, we would expect antagonism of FGF5 to be effective in both men and women. For those individuals treating their scalps with both the MTP3 formulations, we observed significant increases in the proportion of hair roots in anagen, with many participants improving by up to 20 percentage points (improvement in AT ratio of 0.2), and some treated individuals recovering to ~80% anagen. There were no significant differences at any time point in the placebo-treated group. Such observations are indicative of FGF5 inhibitory effects resulting in less hair follicles prematurely entering telogen. Although it was not a primary objective of this study, statistical analysis after separation of the cohorts into male and female participants, despite low power due to small sample size and high variance in the female placebo group, identified highly significant differences from baseline in both females and males, highlighting the utility of FGF5 inhibition in the treatment of both male and female hair loss.

We did note some non-significant differences in the baseline anagen measurements between groups and a larger spread of values in the placebo, particularly in females, likely due to the small sample size, which consequently may have influenced the statistical analyses and led us to approach the interpretation of these data carefully. We also noted that several participants had very low anagen measurements at some sampling time points, likely due to sampling errors and the relatively small number of hairs that are excised from the scalp for this measurement. However, when the overall trends in the data compared to baseline are analyzed, the consistent mean and median increase in anagen for most participants in both treatment groups and for both genders over the course of the study, in contrast to placebo where the median change was 0, is more reflective of a response to treatment, than sampling-based inconsistencies, normal hair cycling or natural variation around a baseline. The placebo group showed no clear pattern over the course of the study.

Hair fall is also a useful indicator of hair cycling, with increased cycling of follicles out of anagen and into catagen/telogen resulting in a higher number of shed hairs. Application of topical formulations containing the FGF5 inhibitory compound MTP3 resulted in significant decreases in shed hair overall and in both males and females. We did note a trend in all cohorts for decreased hair fall at day 56. However, this was only statistically significant for the MTP3-treated groups. Such a trend in hair fall for all groups at day 56 could represent a normal variation in hair cycling or effects through variation in sampling technique. Importantly, statistically significant differences in hair fall were only observed in the MTP3-treated groups, and similarly, the trend for continued reduction in hair loss compared to baseline over the course of the study was only observed in the MTP3 treatment arms. Some imbalance in the baseline hair fall for all 3 cohorts was apparent, with the 0.5% MTP3 group showing higher hair fall at day 0. As with the AT data, the slight imbalances in allocation are likely due to the relatively small sample sizes used in this study. Such imbalance had no effect on the intra-group comparisons, but when comparing magnitude of change with respect to baseline, such imbalance may result in underestimation of biological responses, that is, if starting with a low hair fall baseline, such as in the 0.05% MTP3 group. Nevertheless, we observed a significant reduction compared to baseline for both treatment arms after 112 days of treatment with >90% of participants showing improvement, with significant differences from baseline evident in both males and females. In contrast, 70% of the placebo group had increased hair fall measured at day 112.

Additional evidence of improved hair retention and density was provided by visual grading. Despite being carried out by an identity-blinded independent trained expert evaluator, such assessment remains a subjective measure of hair thickness. However, the striking results seen in this evaluation provide compelling evidence for the efficacy of the topical formulation with MTP3 in blocking FGF5 and reducing hair loss in both males and females. All participants in the 0.095% MTP3 treatment group improved in hair grading over the course of the study, 7 of 11 participants in the 0.5% MTP3 arm increased their visual grading scores and 6 of 7 females overall improved their grading scores. The placebo group had only 2 of 9 participants improve in score. Such findings are supported by our sub-cohort study using scientifically matched serial photography. Quantification of the photography showed improvements in hair density of all measured individuals, and the majority of these continued to increase over the 112 days of the trial. The global photographic method used was somewhat influenced by hair combing, particularly in the male subjects, but this is a feature that could also be influenced by changes in hair density. As such, this method is a limitation of our study, and the data are provided only as supporting information. In larger clinical trials of our FGF5-inhibiting compounds, we plan on assessing hair growth using more sophisticated techniques such as phototrichography.

The earlier findings demonstrate that participants treated with MTP3, the newly identified FGF5-inhibiting monoterpenoid compound, performed significantly better for all measures of hair recovery. We observed improvements in the AT ratio indicating increased hair follicles in the anagen (growth) phase, decreased shedding of hair and improved volume and appearance in the MTP3-treated groups. It appeared that the 0.095% MTP3-treated group performed better than the 0.5% MTP3 group for all measures, and as such, this concentration of MTP3 should be taken forward into larger studies to further confirm efficacy and also to monitor improvements over longer time periods. Performing additional large studies will address the limitation of this small study in terms of sample size and statistical power and will help us further address the efficacy of our FGF5-inhibiting compounds in both genders.

As there are no standardized methods for assessing response of individuals with PHL to treatment, it remains difficult to objectively compare the results of our efficacy study to other hair loss treatments. However, cursory comparisons of our study to those of other botanical extracts do highlight the efficacy of the FGF5-inhibiting active MTP3. For example, treatment with rice bran extract resulted in only modest changes in hair density (10% increase), with significant improvements only observed in males.³⁸ Likewise, methyl vanillate treatment resulted in a 6% increase in hair count and 12% increase in hair mass index.³⁹ The same is true for comparisons of this study against our previous efficacy trial of SO extract, where participants were also from a different ethnic background (Japanese). Nevertheless, an improvement in shed hair after MTP3 treatment was evident compared to our previous trial of FGF5-inhibiting SO extract: 80% reduction in hair fall at day 112 for the MTP3-treated groups vs. 68% at 4 months.²⁷

There is a paucity of published information regarding the efficacy of minoxidil, with many studies reporting subjective measures rather than quantitative data.^40,41 Although significant improvements over placebo are generally reported in men, many of the improvements are modest, with increases in hair growth of ~20% on average (reviewed in Gupta),⁴² and reported for only limited proportion of the study group, for example, in 52% of enrolled participants.⁴³ Similar results were observed for women with mean hair count increases of ~23%.⁴⁴ It will be interesting to directly compare demonstrated FGF5 inhibitory products such as the monoterpenoid MTP3 against the FDA-approved treatments in our preparation for larger trials in men and women. One consistently reported feature of minoxidil treatment is an initial increase in hair shedding as follicles transition to anagen phase and existing telogen hair shafts enter exogen.⁴⁵ Such initial shedding can impact on patients’ compliance and continued use of hair loss products containing minoxidil. As FGF5 inhibition acts to extend the anagen phase, and therefore gradually increases the number of anagen follicles on the head over time, we would not expect any shedding to occur, and this is supported in our data where reductions in hair fall and improvements in density were noted after 6 weeks.

Our FGF5 inhibitor screening process has identified novel potent inhibitors of FGF5 activity, with many members of the monoterpenoid family showing inhibitory activity. Our current novel 2-step in vitro screening approach has removed the need for animal testing and has allowed us to rapidly probe for inhibitory extracts enabling the identification of individual inhibitory molecules. We have translated this in vitro data into treatments with significant clinical effects. With such promising results, we aim to further characterize compounds acting as FGF5 inhibitors and their biochemical effects on hair growth, in order to improve outcomes in individuals affected by pattern hair loss.